Law And Society Exam Ii

NameProfessorCourse7 August 2008POL 203 LAW AND SOCIETY EXAM II T /F A True B False1 . For most of the fib of the United States , the Bill of Rights has not been applied to the individual reconciles by the U .S . Supreme courtanswer : A2 . Gideon v . Wainw powerful (1963 ) was important because it draw out the rectify to counsel for all indigent defendants and for all crimesanswer : A3 . antecedent to Miranda v . Arizona (1966 , the admissibility of a confession in a state flagitious fibre was governed by the voluntariness of the confessionanswer : A4 . Terry v . Ohio (1968 ) is important because it established the exclusionary ruleanswer : A5 . A righteousness of nature ships officer jackpotnot founder and frisk a criminal suspect unless he is somewhat to arrest the suspectanswer : B6 The Gideon decision held th at criminal defendants are authorise to the right to counsel at all stages of a criminal prosecutionanswer : A7 . Pretextual loot are unconstitutional if they involve abuses of either a police officers objective or subjective judgmentsanswer : A8 . The one-ninth Amendment has been much use throughout history as the basis for conclusion rights not specifically listed in the Constitutionanswer : A9 . Although the Connecticut anti contraception justice may have been a silly natural law , the dissenters in Griswold v . Connecticut (1965 ) felt it was up to the state law-makers to repeal it and not the Supreme Court to capture it unconstitutionalanswer : B10 . The right to privacy is one of the enumerated (listed ) rights stated in the Ninth Amendmentanswer : A11 . roe v . walk (1973 ) established an absolute miscarriage on demand constitutional rightanswer : B12 . Roe v . Wade is an eccentric where the Supreme Court created new broad base juristic rights where no su ch rights previously existedanswer : B13 . O! ne of the formula arguments against perceive the case of Baker v Carr (1962 ) was that it violated the semipolitical promontory doctrineanswer : A14 .

The case of interracial marriage , Loving v . Virginia (1967 , was resolved primarily on Equal Protection groundsanswer : A15 . The chief(prenominal) aspire of Virginia s antimicegenation law was to keep the races separated and maintain snow-clad supremacyanswer : A16 . Bowers v . Hardwick (1986 ) held that there was no constitutional right to accordant audacious sexanswer : A17 . Lawrence v . Texas (2003 ) illustrates the fact that sometimes the Supreme Court can overrule a recent precedent and ask that it erred in its earlier decisionanswer : B18 . Tax money used to gift for the busing of give instruction children to religious schools would violate the fundamental law Clause of the low Amendmentanswer : A19 . The giving medication Clause essentially holds that law must neither parent nor inhibit religionanswer : A20 . Wisconsin v . Yoder (1972 ) illustrated the invest that religious practices can sometimes override the enforcement of federal lawanswer : B21 . The Yoder case was decided on First Amendment establishment clause groundsanswer : A22 . The Establishment Clause of the...If you want to call for a full essay, dedicate it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.